Browsing by Author "Cendales, Boris"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Cross-culturally approaching the cycling behaviour questionnaire (CBQ): Evidence from 19 countries
    (2022) Useche, Sergio A.; Alonso, Francisco; Boyko, Aleksey; Buyvol, Polina; Castaneda, Isaac; Cendales, Boris; Cervantes, Arturo; Echiburu, Tomas; Faus, Mireia; Feitosa, Zuleide; Gene, Javier; Gonzalez-Marin, Adela; Gonzalez, Victor; Gnap, Jozef; Ibrahimj, Mohd K.; Janstrup, Kira H.; Javadinejad, Arash; Makarova, Irijna; McIlroy, Rich; Mikusova, Miroslava; Moller, Mette; Ngueuteu-Fouaka, Sylvain; O'Hern, Steve; Orozco-Fontalvo, Mauricio; Shubenkova, Ksenia; Siebert, Felix; Soto, Jose; Stephens, Amanda N.; Valle-Escolano, Raquel; Wang, Yonggang; Willberg, Ellias; Wintersberger, Phillip; Zeuwts, Linus; Zulkipli, Zarir H.; Montoro, Luis
    Given different advances in applied literature, risky and positive behaviours keep gaining ground as key contributors for riding safety outcomes. In this regard, the Cycling Behaviour Question-naire (CBQ) represents one of the tools available to assess the core dimensions of cycling behaviour and their relationship with road safety outcomes from a behavioural perspective. Nevertheless, it has never been psychometrically approached through a cross-cultural perspec-tive. Therefore, this study aimed to perform the cross-cultural validation of the CBQ, examining its psychometric properties, reliability indexes, validity insights and descriptive scores in 19 countries distributed across five regions: Europe, America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. For this purpose, it was used the data retrieved from a full sample of 7,001 urban cyclists responding to a large-scale electronic survey. Participants had a mean age of M = 36.15 (SD = 14.71), ranging between 16 and 83 years. The results of this large-scale study empirically support the assumption that the 29-item version of the CBQ has a fair dimensional structure and item composition, good internal consistency, reliability indexes, and an interesting set of validity insights. Among these results, there can be highlighted that: (i) Structurally speaking, the questionnaire works better under a three-factor dimensionality, keeping all its 29 items, whose factor loadings are >0.400 in