Browsing by Author "Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A brief tablet-based intervention benefits linguistic and communicative abilities in toddlers and preschoolers
    (2024) Pena, Marcela; Vasquez-Venegas, Constanza; Cortes, Patricia; Pittaluga, Enrica; Herrera, Mitzy; Pino, Esteban J.; Escobar, Raul G.; Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine; Guevara, Pamela
    Young children's linguistic and communicative abilities are foundational for their academic achievement and overall well-being. We present the positive outcomes of a brief tablet-based intervention aimed at teaching toddlers and preschoolers new word-object and letter-sound associations. We conducted two experiments, one involving toddlers ( similar to 24 months old, n = 101) and the other with preschoolers ( similar to 42 months old, n = 152). Using a pre-post equivalent group design, we measured the children's improvements in language and communication skills resulting from the intervention. Our results showed that the intervention benefited toddlers' verbal communication and preschoolers' speech comprehension. Additionally, it encouraged vocalizations in preschoolers and enhanced long-term memory for the associations taught in the study for all participants. In summary, our study demonstrates that the use of a ludic tablet-based intervention for teaching new vocabulary and pre-reading skills can improve young children's linguistic and communicative abilities, which are essential for future development.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Earlier Speech Exposure Does Not Accelerate Speech Acquisition
    (2012) Pena, Marcela; Werker, Janet F.; Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine
    Critical periods in language acquisition have been discussed primarily with reference to studies of people who are deaf or bilingual. Here, we provide evidence on the opening of sensitivity to the linguistic environment by studying the response to a change of phoneme at a native and nonnative phonetic boundary in full-term and preterm human infants using event-related potentials. Full-term infants show a decline in their discrimination of nonnative phonetic contrasts between 9 and 12 months of age. Because the womb is a high-frequency filter, many phonemes are strongly degraded in utero. Preterm infants thus benefit from earlier and richer exposure to broadcast speech. We find that preterms do not take advantage of this enriched linguistic environment: the decrease in amplitude of the mismatch response to a nonnative change of phoneme at the end of the first year of life was dependent on maturational age and not on the duration of exposure to broadcast speech. The shaping of phonological representations by the environment is thus strongly constrained by brain maturation factors.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Neural indicators of articulator-specific sensorimotor influences on infant speech perception
    (2021) Choi, Dawoon; Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine; Pena, Marcela; Werker, Janet F.
    While there is increasing acceptance that even young infants detect correspondences between heard and seen speech, the common view is that oral-motor movements related to speech production cannot influence speech perception until infants begin to babble or speak. We investigated the extent of multimodal speech influences on auditory speech perception in prebabbling infants who have limited speech-like oral-motor repertoires. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine how sensorimotor influences to the infant's own articulatory movements impact auditory speech perception in 3-mo-old infants. In experiment 1, there were ERP discriminative responses to phonetic category changes across two phonetic contrasts (bilabial-dental /ba/-/da/; dental-retroflex /da/-/cia/) in a mismatch paradigm, indicating that infants auditorily discriminated both contrasts. In experiment 2, inhibiting infants' own tongue-tip movements had a disruptive influence on the early ERP discriminative response to the /da/-/cia/ contrast only. The same articulatory inhibition had contrasting effects on the perception of the /ba/-/da/ contrast, which requires different articulators (the lips vs. the tongue) during production, and the /da/-/cia/ contrast, whereby both phones require tongue-tip movement as a place of articulation. This articulatory distinction between the two contrasts plausibly accounts for the distinct influence of tongue-tip suppression on the neural responses to phonetic category change perception in definitively prebabbling, 3-mo-old, infants. The results showing a specificity in the relation between oral-motor inhibition and phonetic speech discrimination suggest a surprisingly early mapping between auditory and motor speech representation already in prebabbling infants.