Browsing by Author "van Lange P.A.M."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemMany labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings(SAGE Publications Inc., 2018) Klein R.A.; Ijzerman H.; Vianello M.; Dalla Rosa A.; Hasselman F.; de Vries M.; Podesta L.; Hasselman F.; Podesta L.; Voermans I.P.J.; Adams B.G.; Brandt M.J.; de Bruijn M.; Adams B.G.; Adams R.B.; Nelson A.J.; Pinter B.; Steiner T.G.; Alper S.; Aveyard M.; Maitner A.T.; Axt J.R.; Babalola M.T.; Bahnik S.; Batra R.; Berkics M.; Bernstein M.J.; Berry D.R.; Bialobrzeska O.; Frankowska N.; Karick H.; Osowiecka M.; Binan E.D.; Dagona Z.K.; Gandi J.C.; Karick H.; Bocian K.; Wronska M.K.; Busching R.; Redei A.C.; Cai H.; Cambier F.; Friedman M.; Kervyn N.; Cambier F.; Friedman M.; Kervyn N.; Cantarero K.; Carmichael C.L.; Ceric F.; Sirlopu D.; Ceric F.; Chandler J.; Chandler J.; Chang J.-H.; Chang J.-H.; Chatard A.; Chatard A.; Chen E.E.; Cheong W.; Cicero D.C.; Coen S.; Szeto S.; Coleman J.A.; Joy-Gaba J.A.; Collisson B.; Conway M.A.; Lipsey N.P.; Losee J.E.; Pogge G.; Corker K.S.; Curran P.G.; Cushman F.; Dalgar I.; Davis W.E.; De Schutter L.; Devos T.; de Vries M.; de Vries M.; Dogulu C.; Dozo N.; Dukes K.N.; Dunham Y.; Durrheim K.; Ebersole C.R.; Nosek B.A.; Edlund J.E.; Eller A.; Freyre M.-A.; English A.S.; Finck C.; Jimenez-Leal W.; Galliani E.M.; Ghoshal T.; Giessner S.R.; Gill T.; Packard G.; Gnambs T.; Gnambs T.; Gomez A.; Vazquez A.; Gonzalez R.; Graham J.; Grahe J.E.; Grahek I.; Green E.G.T.; Hai K.; Haigh M.; Myachykov A.; Neave N.; Smith M.A.; Haines E.L.; Hall M.P.; Heffernan M.E.; Hicks J.A.; Houdek P.; Huntsinger J.R.; Mallett R.K.; Huynh H.P.; Inbar Y.; Innes-Ker A.H.; Sundfelt O.K.; John M.-S.; Skorinko J.L.M.; Kamiloglu R.G.; Kappes H.B.; Karabati S.; Keller V.N.; Pilati R.; Kende A.; Ujhelyi A.; Knezevic G.; Kovacs C.; Krueger L.E.; Kurapov G.; Kurtz J.; Welch C.; Lakens D.; Smolders K.C.H.J.; Lazarevic L.B.; Levitan C.A.; Lewis N.A.; Lins S.; Neto F.; Maassen E.; van Aert R.C.M.; van Assen M.A.L.M.; Malingumu W.; Marotta S.A.; Mededovic J.; Mededovic J.; Petrovic B.; Mena-Pacheco F.; Ocampo A.; Vega L.D.; Milfont T.L.; Morris W.L.; Murphy S.C.; Neijenhuijs K.; Neijenhuijs K.; Nichols A.L.; O'donnell S.L.; Oikawa H.; Oikawa M.; Ong E.; Tang A.C.W.; Orosz G.; Perez-Sanchez R.; Smith-Castro V.; Pollmann M.M.H.; Rutchick A.M.; Saavedra P.; Saeri A.K.; Tear M.J.; Salomon E.; Schmidt K.; Schonbrodt F.D.; Spachtholz P.; Sekerdej M.B.; Szumowska E.; Sobkow A.; Traczyk J.; Sowden W.; Srivastava M.; Stouten J.; Street C.N.H.; Tanzer N.; Theriault J.; Thomae M.; Wood M.; Torres D.; Tybur J.M.; van Lange P.A.M.; van der Hulst M.; van 't Veer A.E.; Vasquez-Echeverria A.; Vaughn L.A.; Verniers C.; Verschoor M.; Vranka M.A.; Wichman A.L.; Williams L.A.; Woodzicka J.A.; Young L.; Zelenski J.M.; Zhijia Z.; Nosek B.A.© The Author(s) 2018.We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples that comprised 15,305 participants from 36 countries and territories. Using the conventional criterion of statistical significance (p <.05), we found that 15 (54%) of the replications provided evidence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion (p <.0001), 14 (50%) of the replications still provided such evidence, a reflection of the extremely highpowered design. Seven (25%) of the replications yielded effect sizes larger than the original ones, and 21 (75%) yielded effect sizes smaller than the original ones. The median comparable Cohen’s ds were 0.60 for the original findings and 0.15 for the replications. The effect sizes were small (< 0.20) in 16 of the replications (57%), and 9 effects (32%) were in the direction opposite the direction of the original effect. Across settings, the Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity in 11 (39%) of the replication effects, and most of those were among the findings with the largest overall effect sizes; only 1 effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity according to this measure. Only 1 effect had a tau value greater than.20, an indication of moderate heterogeneity. Eight others had tau values near or slightly above.10, an indication of slight heterogeneity. Moderation tests indicated that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the tasks were administered in lab versus online. Exploratory comparisons revealed little heterogeneity between Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultures and less WEIRD cultures (i.e., cultures with relatively high and low WEIRDness scores, respectively). Cumulatively, variability in the observed effect sizes was attributable more to the effect being studied than to the sample or setting in which it was studied.
- ItemREPLY TO NIELSEN ET AL.: Social mindfulness is associated with countries’ environmental performance and individual environmental concern(National Academy of Sciences, 2022) van Doesum N.J.; Romano A.; van Doesum N.J.; Murphy R.O.; Murphy R.O.; Gallucci M.; Aharonov-Majar E.; Athenstaedt U.; Au W.T.; Bai L.; Bohm R.; Bohm R.; Bohm R.; Bovina I.; Buchan N.R.; Chen X.-P.; Dumont K.B.; Engelmann J.B.; Shalvi S.; Engelmann J.B.; Eriksson K.; Euh H.; Fiedler S.; Friesen J.; Gachter S.; Garcia C.; Gonzalez R.; Graf S.; Hrebickova M.; Growiec K.; Guimond S.; Immer-Bernold E.; Joireman J.; Karagonlar G.; Kawakami K.; Kiyonari T.; Kou Y.; Kyrtsis A.-A.; Tsirbas Y.; Lay S.; Leonardelli G.J.; Leonardelli G.J.; Li N.P.; Li Y.; Maciejovsky B.; Manesi Z.; van Lange P.A.M.; Mashuri A.; Mashuri A.; Mok A.; Moser K.S.; Moser K.S.; Motak L.; Netedu A.; Platow M.J.; Raczka-Winkler K.; Weber B.; Reinders Folmer C.P.; Reinders Folmer C.P.; Reyna C.; Simao C.; Stivers A.W.; Strimling P.; Utz S.; Utz S.; van der Meij L.; Waldzus S.; Wang Y.; Weisel O.; Wildschut T.; Winter F.; Wu J.; Wu J.; Yong J.C.
- ItemSocial mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe(National Academy of Sciences, 2021) van Doesum N.J.; Romano A.; van Doesum N.J.; Manesi Z.; van Lange P.A.M.; van Doesum N.J.; Murphy R.O.; Murphy R.O.; Gallucci M.; Aharonov-Majar E.; Athenstaedt U.; Au W.T.; Bai L.; Böhm R.; Böhm R.; Böhm R.; Bovina I.; Buchan N.R.; Chen X.P.; Dumont K.B.; Engelmann J.B.; Shalvi S.; Engelmann J.B.; Eriksson K.; Euh H.; Fiedler S.; Friesen J.; Gächter S.; Garcia C.; González R.; Graf S.; Hrebíčková M.; Growiec K.; Guimond S.; Immer-Bernold E.; Joireman J.; Karagonlar G.; Kawakami K.; Kiyonari T.; Kou Y.; Kuhlman D.M.; Kyrtsis A.A.; Tsirbas Y.; Lay S.; Leonardelli G.J.; Leonardelli G.J.; Li N.P.; Li Y.; Maciejovsky B.; Mashuri A.; Mashuri A.; Mok A.; Moser K.S.; Moser K.S.; Moták L.; Netedu A.; Pammi C.; Platow M.J.; Raczka-Winkler K.; Weber B.; Reinders Folmer C.P.; Reinders Folmer C.P.; Reyna C.; Simão C.; Stivers A.W.; Strimling P.; Utz S.; Utz S.; van der Meij L.; Waldzus S.; Wang Y.; Weisel O.; Wildschut T.; Winter F.; Wu J.; Wu J.; Yong J.C.© 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.Humans are social animals, but not everyone will be mindful of others to the same extent. Individual differences have been found, but would social mindfulness also be shaped by one's location in the world? Expecting cross-national differences to exist, we examined if and how social mindfulness differs across countries. At little to no material cost, social mindfulness typically entails small acts of attention or kindness. Even though fairly common, such low-cost cooperation has received little empirical attention. Measuring social mindfulness across 31 samples from industrialized countries and regions (n = 8,354), we found considerable variation. Among selected country-level variables, greater social mindfulness was most strongly associated with countries' better general performance on environmental protection. Together, our findings contribute to the literature on prosociality by targeting the kind of everyday cooperation that is more focused on communicating benevolence than on providing material benefits.