Browsing by Author "Perez, Carlos M."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    HLA-B*5701 frequency in Chilean HIV-infected patients and in general population
    (CONTEXTO, 2010) Poggi, Helena; Vera, Alejandra; Lagos, Marcela; Solari, Sandra; Rodriguez P, Luis; Perez, Carlos M.
    It has been demonstrated that HLA-B*5701 screening reduces the risk for hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir in HIV-infected patients. Since B*5701 prevalence varies among different populations, it is important to determine the carrier frequency prior to its use for the screening of HIV-infected patients. The aim of this study was to determine HLA-B*5701 carrier frequency in Chilean general population and HIV-infected patients referred for B*5701 typing. For that purpose 300 blood bank donors and 492 abacavir-naive HIV-infected patients from Chile were screened for B*5701 by a sequence specific primer PCR. We detected 14/300 (4.7%) B*57-positive individuals in the Chilean general population, 11 (3.7%) were B*5701 positive, and 3 (1%) had another subtype. All were heterozygous, thus a B*5701 allele frequency of 2% was determined. Eleven of 492 (2.2 %) HIV-patients carried a B*5701 allele. The difference between these frequencies is probably due to slow progression of HIV infection in HLA-B*5701 carriers, thus less patients would require antiretroviral therapy and B*5701 typing. Considering the usefulness of B*5701 screening, its prevalence in the Chilean general population, and the availability of a validated method, we conclude that HLA-B*5701 typing in Chilean HIV-infected patients about to initiate abacavir treatment is strongly recommended.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in HIV-1-infected patients
    (LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, 2010) Perez, Carlos M.; Dominguez, Maria I.; Ceballos, Maria E.; Moreno, Cristina; Labarca, Jaime A.; Rabagliati, Ricardo; Vasquez, Patricia; Lasso, Martin; Serri, Michel
    Objective: To characterize the clinical presentation, course and mortality of pandemic influenza in HIV-1-infected patients in Santiago, Chile.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Safety and Non-Inferiority Evaluation of Two Immunization Schedules with an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Abarca Villaseca, Katia; Iturriaga Ortiz, Carolina Alejandra; Urzua, Marcela; Le Corre Perez, Monique Nicole; Pineda Núñez, Augusto Naim; Fernandez Anwandter, Carolina; Domínguez De Landa, María Angelica; González Carbonell, Pablo Andrés; Bueno, Susan M.; Donato, Paulina; Espinoza, Pilar; Fuentes, Daniela; Gonzalez, Marcela; Guzman, Paula; Munoz-Venturelli, Paula; Perez, Carlos M.; Potin, Marcela; Rojas, Alvaro; Gonzalez-Aramundiz, Jose, V; Galvez, Nicolas M. S.; Aguirre-Boza, Francisca; Aljaro, Sofia; Federico Batiz, Luis; Campisto, Yessica; Cepeda, Mariela; Cortes, Aaron; Lopez, Sofia; Loreto Perez, Maria; Schilling, Andrea; Kalergis, Alexis M.
    Several vaccines have been developed to control the COVID-19 pandemic. CoronaVac (R), an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, has demonstrated safety and immunogenicity, preventing severe COVID-19 cases. We investigate the safety and non-inferiority of two immunization schedules of CoronaVac (R) in a non-inferiority trial in healthy adults. A total of 2302 healthy adults were enrolled at 8 centers in Chile and randomly assigned to two vaccination schedules, receiving two doses with either 14 or 28 days between each. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were solicited adverse events (AEs) within 7 days of each dose, and comparing the number of cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection 14 days after the second dose between the schedules, respectively. The most frequent local AE was pain at the injection site, which was less frequent in participants aged >= 60 years. Other local AEs were reported in less than 5% of participants. The most frequent systemic AEs were headache, fatigue, and myalgia. Most AEs were mild and transient. There were no significant differences for local and systemic AEs between schedules. A total of 58 COVID-19 cases were confirmed, and all but 2 of them were mild. No differences were observed in the proportion of COVID-19 cases between schedules. CoronaVac (R) is safe, especially in >= 60-year-old participants. Both schedules protected against COVID-19 hospitalization.