Charting the landscape of interpretation, theory rivalry, and underdetermination in quantum mechanics

dc.contributor.authorAcuna, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T23:55:02Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T23:55:02Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractWhen we speak about different interpretations of quantum mechanics it is suggested that there is one single quantum theory that can be interpreted in different ways. However, after an explicit characterization of what it is to interpret quantum mechanics, the right diagnosis is that we have a case of predictively equivalent rival theories. I extract some lessons regarding the resulting underdetermination of theory choice. Issues about theoretical identity, theoretical and methodological pluralism, and the prospects for a realist stance towards quantum theory can be properly addressed once we recognize that interpretations of quantum mechanics are rival theories.
dc.description.funderFONDECYT
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11229-019-02159-z
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0964
dc.identifier.issn0039-7857
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02159-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/95067
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000621872500037
dc.issue.numero2
dc.language.isoen
dc.pagina.final1740
dc.pagina.inicio1711
dc.revistaSynthese
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectQuantum mechanics
dc.subjectEmpirical equivalence
dc.subjectUnderdetermination
dc.subjectPluralism
dc.subjectTheory identity
dc.titleCharting the landscape of interpretation, theory rivalry, and underdetermination in quantum mechanics
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen198
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files