A comprehensive comparison between shortest-path HARP refinement, SinMod, and DENSEanalysis processing tools applied to CSPAMM and DENSE images

dc.contributor.authorMella, Hernan
dc.contributor.authorMura, Joaquin
dc.contributor.authorSotelo, Julio
dc.contributor.authorUribe, Sergio
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T22:08:16Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T22:08:16Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractWe addressed comprehensively the performance of Shortest-Path HARP Refinement (SP-HR), SinMod, and DENSEanalysis using 2D slices of synthetic CSPAMM and DENSE images with realistic contrasts obtained from 3D phantoms. The three motion estimation techniques were interrogated under ideal and no-ideal conditions (with MR induced artifacts, noise, and through-plane motion), considering several resolutions and noise levels. Under noisy conditions, and for isotropic pixel sizes of 1.5 mm and 3.0 mm in CSPAMM and DENSE images respectively, the nRMSE obtained for the circumferential and radial strain components were 10.7 +/- 10.8% and 25.5 +/- 14.8% using SP-HR, 11.9 +/- 2.5% and 29.3 +/- 6.5% using SinMod, and 6.4 +/- 2.0% and 18.2 +/- 4.6% using DENSEanalysis. Overall, the results showed that SP-HR tends to fail for large tissue motions, whereas SinMod and DENSEanalysis gave accurate displacement and strain field estimations, being the last which performed the best.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mri.2021.07.001
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5894
dc.identifier.issn0730-725X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2021.07.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/94285
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000697019700002
dc.language.isoen
dc.pagina.final26
dc.pagina.inicio14
dc.revistaMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectTagging MRI
dc.subjectCSPAMM
dc.subjectDENSE MRI
dc.subjectCardiac MRI
dc.subjectCardiac strain
dc.subjectHARP
dc.subjectSP-HR
dc.subjectSinMod
dc.subjectDENSEAnalysis
dc.subject.ods03 Good Health and Well-being
dc.subject.odspa03 Salud y bienestar
dc.titleA comprehensive comparison between shortest-path HARP refinement, SinMod, and DENSEanalysis processing tools applied to CSPAMM and DENSE images
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen83
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files