OBSTINATE RIGOUR: POPULISM WITHOUT APOLOGIES AUTHORS' REPLY TO CRITICS1

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCadahia, Luciana
dc.contributor.authorBiglieri, Paula
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T20:06:01Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T20:06:01Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIn this article we offer a response to each of the authors who participated in the exchange. But instead of responding to each one separately, we decided to organise our writing around three themes. In the first place, we propose an intellectual, militant and biographical description that helps to put the original motivations of our book Seven Essays on Populism into context. Secondly, we offer a reflection on the role of ontology in our text, paying special attention to the critiques made by Barros & Martinez Prado, Bosteels and Marchart. Thirdly, we conclude with a deepening of the link between populism and feminism, paying special attention to the lucid observations of Barros & Martinez Prado and Gunnarsson-Payne.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.issn1825-5167
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/91714
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001049395700015
dc.issue.numero2
dc.language.isoen
dc.pagina.final327
dc.pagina.inicio299
dc.revistaEtica & politica
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectPopulism
dc.subjectfeminism
dc.subjectontology
dc.subjectantagonism
dc.titleOBSTINATE RIGOUR: POPULISM WITHOUT APOLOGIES AUTHORS' REPLY TO CRITICS1
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen25
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files
Collections
Artículos de revistas