The distance between the fibular collateral ligament tunnel and the common peroneal nerve allows a posterolateral corner reconstruction without neurolysis
Loading...
Date
2023
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Institute for Ionics
Abstract
© 2023, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.Purpose: The most popular knee posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction techniques describe that a common peroneal nerve (CPN) neurolysis must be done to safely address the posterolateral aspect of the knee. The purpose of this study was to measure the distance between the CPN and the fibular insertion of the FCL in different degrees of knee flexion in cadaveric specimens, to identify if tunnel drilling could be done anatomically and safely without a CPN neurolysis. Methods: Ex vivo experimental analytical study. Ten fresh frozen human knees were dissected leaving FCL and CPN in situ. Shortest distance from the centre of the FCL distal tunnel and CPN was measured (antero-posterior and proximal-distal wire-nerve distances) at 90°, 60°, 30°, and 0° of knee flexion. Measurements between different flexion angles were compared and correlation between knee flexion angle and distance was identified. Results: The mean distance between the FCL tunnel and the CPN at 90° were 21.15 ± 6.74 mm posteriorly (95% CI: 16.33–25.97) and 13.01 ± 3.55 mm distally (95% CI: 10.47–15.55). The minimum values were 9.8 mm posteriorly and 8.9 mm, respectively. These distances were smaller at 0° (p ≤ 0.017). At 90° of knee flexion, the mean distance from the fibular tip to the CPN distally was 23.46 ± 4.13 mm (20.51–26.41). Conclusion: Anatomic localization and orientation of fibular tunnels can be done safely while avoiding nerve neurolysis. Further studies should aim to in vivo measurements and results.
Description
Keywords
Cadaveric study, Common peroneal nerve, Multiligamentary knee reconstruction, Posterolateral corner