Exploring gaps in mapping marine ecosystem services: A benchmark analysis

dc.contributor.authorNahuelhual, L.
dc.contributor.authorVergara, X.
dc.contributor.authorBozzeda, F.
dc.contributor.authorCampos, G.
dc.contributor.authorSubida, M. D.
dc.contributor.authorOuteiro, L.
dc.contributor.authorVillasante, S.
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T12:05:24Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T12:05:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractWe assessed the gaps between current and "model mapping routines", which represent a benchmark for mapping marine ecosystem services (ESs). Model mapping routines comprised 17 selected variables and their best-rated alternatives depending on the mapping purpose, namely, marine spatial planning, environmental impact assessment, vulnerability and risk analysis, marine protected areas management, payments for ecosystem services, and natural resources management. We conducted a systematic search of articles (n = 64) from which information on the 17 variables and their alternatives was retrieved. We assessed gaps using similarity matrices, according to the co-occurrence index. The largest gaps (as measured by average distances >0.5 between actual and best options) occurred in articles reporting natural resources management as purpose, whereas the smallest were related to marine protected areas management and payments for ecosystem services. The gaps were due to departures in different individual variables. For example, in the case of marine spatial planning the omission of tradeoffs, scenario analysis, multiple scales, and threshold analyses explained the gap, whereas in vulnerability and risk assessment the omission of thresholds, the lack of consistency of the indicators used, and the absence of a definition of ESs explained the gap. We trust that this study will help to recognize that ESs mapping studies should be guided by the purpose of a given intervention rather than by the technical capacities and disciplines of the researchers, if the ESs approach expects to reach a real impact into public policies.
dc.description.funderCONICYT Chile through FONDAP
dc.description.funderFondecyt
dc.description.funderICM grant from Ministerio de Economia, Fomento y Turismo (Chilean Government)
dc.description.funderEuropean COST Action "Ocean Governance for Sustainability -challenges, options and the role of science"
dc.description.funderICES Science Fund Project "Social Transformations of Marine Social-Ecological Systems"
dc.description.funderCYTED program for the ECOMAR Network
dc.fechaingreso.objetodigital03-04-2024
dc.format.extent12 páginas
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105193
dc.identifier.eissn1873-524X
dc.identifier.issn0964-5691
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105193
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/76002
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000534266700006
dc.information.autorucCiencias Biológicas;Fernandez Bergia Miriam Ethel;S/I;104166
dc.information.autorucCiencias Biológicas;Nascimento Dacosta Subida Mari;S/I;220046
dc.language.isoen
dc.nota.accesocontenido parcial
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.revistaOCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectEcosystem services
dc.subjectMapping
dc.subjectMaritime spatial planning
dc.subjectMarine ecosystems
dc.subjectBest practices
dc.subjectTRADE-OFFS
dc.subjectDECISION-MAKING
dc.subjectCOASTAL VALUES
dc.subjectNATIONAL-PARK
dc.subjectVALUATION
dc.subjectINDICATORS
dc.subjectCHALLENGES
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT
dc.subjectCARBON
dc.subjectSEA
dc.subject.ods15 Life on Land
dc.subject.ods11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
dc.subject.odspa15 Vida de ecosistemas terrestres
dc.subject.odspa11 Ciudades y comunidades sostenibles
dc.titleExploring gaps in mapping marine ecosystem services: A benchmark analysis
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen192
sipa.codpersvinculados104166
sipa.codpersvinculados220046
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.indexScopus
sipa.trazabilidadCarga SIPA;09-01-2024
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2024-04-03. Exploring gaps in mapping marine ecosystem services - A benchmark analysis.pdf
Size:
3.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: