Robotic pelvic side-wall dissection and en-bloc excision for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: outcomes on feasibility and safety

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLokuhetty, Naradha
dc.contributor.authorTomas Larach, Jose
dc.contributor.authorRajkomar, Amrish K. S.
dc.contributor.authorMohan, Helen
dc.contributor.authorWaters, Peadar S.
dc.contributor.authorHeriot, Alexander G.
dc.contributor.authorWarrier, Satish K.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T21:07:52Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T21:07:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: Global differences exist in managing lateral pelvic nodes in rectal cancer. Recent studies demonstrate improved local recurrence rates in patients undergoing lateral pelvic lymph node dissections (LPND) in addition to total mesorectal excision (TME) for advanced lower rectal cancer. This study aims to report on the safety and feasibility of the robotic approach in patients undergoing pelvic sidewall lymph node dissection or en-bloc sidewall resection for advanced lower rectal cancer.
dc.description.abstractMethods: Patients who underwent an elective robotic pelvic sidewall lymph node dissection or en-bloc sidewall resection for locally advanced rectal cancer with suspicious lateral lymph nodes or pelvic side wall involvement between January 2018 and March 2021 were included. Demographic, clinical, perioperative and histopathological variables were recorded and analysed.
dc.description.abstractResults: Eight patients (3 males) with a mean age of 55 (33-73) years and mean body mass index of 26.3 (20.7-30.0) kg/m(2) were included. The median operative time and blood loss were 458.75 (360-540) min and 143.75 (100-300) mL, respectively. There were no conversions or intra-operative complications. There were three post-operative complications recorded (two ileus and one anastomotic leak which required an endoscopic washout in theatre and intravenous antibiotics thereafter). Median length of stay was 12.75 (7-23) days. All patients had an R0 resection, and the median lateral pelvic lymph node yield was 9.1 (6-14).
dc.description.abstractConclusion: This series demonstrates the practicality and the safety of the robotic approach in the introduction of this technique for en-bloc resection or LPND in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ans.17757
dc.identifier.eissn1445-2197
dc.identifier.issn1445-1433
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17757
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/93442
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000793930900001
dc.issue.numero9
dc.language.isoen
dc.pagina.final2191
dc.pagina.inicio2185
dc.revistaAnz journal of surgery
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectlateral pelvic lymph node dissection
dc.subjectpelvic sidewall
dc.subjectrectal cancer
dc.subjectrobotic
dc.subject.ods03 Good Health and Well-being
dc.subject.odspa03 Salud y bienestar
dc.titleRobotic pelvic side-wall dissection and en-bloc excision for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: outcomes on feasibility and safety
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen92
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files
Collections
Artículos de revistas