Neurorights in the Constitution: from neurotechnology to ethics and politics

dc.catalogadorvdr
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorValera, Luca
dc.contributor.authorRamos Vergara, Paulina
dc.contributor.authorSitaram, Ranganatha
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-18T18:15:17Z
dc.date.available2025-03-18T18:15:17Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractNeuroimaging technologies such as brain-computer interfaces and neurofeedback have evolved rapidly as new tools for cognitive neuroscience and as potential clinical interventions. However, along with these developments, concern has grown based on the fear of the potential misuse of neurotechnology. In October 2021, Chile became the first country to include neurorights in its Constitution. The present article is divided into two parts. In the first section, we describe the path followed by neurorights that led to its inclusion in the Chilean Constitution, and the neurotechnologies usually involved in neurorights discussions. In the second part, we discuss two potential problems of neurorights. We begin by pointing out some epistemological concerns regarding neurorights, mainly referring to the ambiguity of the concepts used in neurolegislations, the difficult relationship between neuroscience and politics and the weak reasons for urgency in legislating. We then describe the dangers of overprotective laws in medical research, based on the detrimental effect of recent legislation in Chile and the potential risk posed by neurorights to the benefits of neuroscience development. This article aims to engage with the scientific community interested in neurotechnology and neurorights in an interdisciplinary reflection of the potential consequences of neurorights.This article is part of the theme issue 'Neurofeedback: new territories and neurocognitive mechanisms of endogenous neuromodulation'.
dc.fechaingreso.objetodigital2025-03-18
dc.format.extent10 páginas
dc.fuente.origenSCOPUS
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rstb.2023.0098
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2970
dc.identifier.scopusidSCOPUS_ID:85206872757
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0098
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/102753
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001340597400012
dc.information.autorucEscuela de Medicina; Valera, Luca; 0000-0002-1693-396X; 1024158
dc.information.autorucFacultad de Derecho; Ramos Vergara, Paulina; S/I; 67127
dc.issue.numero1915
dc.language.isoen
dc.pagina.final10
dc.pagina.inicio20230098
dc.pagina.inicio1
dc.revistaPhilosophical Transactions B
dc.rightsacceso abierto
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectChile
dc.subjectConstitution
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectNeuroethics
dc.subjectNeurorights
dc.subjectNeurotechnology
dc.subject.ods03 Good health and well-being
dc.subject.odspa03 Salud y bienestar
dc.titleNeurorights in the Constitution: from neurotechnology to ethics and politics
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen379
sipa.codpersvinculados1024158
sipa.codpersvinculados67127
sipa.trazabilidadSCOPUS;2024-10-27
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ruiz-et-al-2024-neurorights-in-the-constitution-from-neurotechnology-to-ethics-and-politics.pdf
Size:
457.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: